Zapier vs Make (Integromat): The Ultimate 2026 Automation Tool Comparison

When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission.

Zapier vs Make (Integromat): The Ultimate 2026 Automation Tool Comparison

You’ve outgrown manually transferring data between your CRM, email marketing tool, and accounting software. Maybe you’re already using one automation platform but wondering if the other could save you more money—or handle more complex workflows. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) are the two heavyweights in no-code automation, but they’re not interchangeable.

I’ve spent weeks building real-world workflows on both platforms over the past two years. This isn’t a theoretical breakdown. It’s a head‑to‑head comparison covering pricing, ease of use, reliability, and advanced capabilities—so you can decide which one actually fits your work.

What Each Tool Does Best

Zapier is the household name. It connects over 7,000 apps with simple “if this, then that” rules called Zaps. Its strength is simplicity: you can set up a basic automation in minutes without thinking about data transformation or error handling.

Make (still often called Integromat) started as a more visual, developer‑friendly alternative. Its interface is a drag‑and‑drop canvas where you can build multi‑step scenarios with logic, loops, routers, and data aggregators. It handles complexities that Zapier either charges extra for or can’t do at all.

But which one is right for you? Let’s break it down.

---

Detailed Feature Breakdown

1. Ease of Use

Aspect	Zapier	Make
Setup speed	1–5 minutes for simple Zaps	5–15 minutes for simple scenarios
Learning curve	Minimal – linear step builder	Moderate – visual canvas with branching
Template library	Thousands of pre-built Zaps	Hundreds of templates (fewer, but often more detailed)
Mobile app	Yes (iOS/Android)	Yes, but limited to monitoring

Zapier is the clear winner for beginners or anyone who just needs a two‑step “new Gmail email → create Trello card.” You pick a trigger app, an action app, map a few fields, and you’re done. Make’s learning curve is steeper—the visual editor requires you to understand modules, connections, and data flow.

That said, Make’s visual approach pays off for complex automations. Seeing the entire pipeline on one canvas helps you debug faster and add conditional logic without guesswork.

2. Pricing

Pricing structures differ significantly. Both offer free tiers, but the costs scale differently for power users.

Zapier pricing (as of 2026):

• Free: 100 tasks/month, 30‑minute update intervals, 5 Zaps
• Starter: $29.99/month (billed yearly) – 750 tasks, 15‑minute updates, 3 premium apps
• Professional: $73.99/month – 2,000 tasks, 2‑minute updates, unlimited premium apps, filters, paths
• Team: $99/month – 750 tasks per user, shared app connections, advanced admin
• Company: Custom – 50,000+ tasks, priority support

Make pricing (as of 2026):

• Free: 1,000 operations/month, 15‑minute intervals, 2 active scenarios
• Starter: $9.99/month – 10,000 operations, 5‑minute intervals, 5 active scenarios
• Pro: $16.99/month – 20,000 operations, 1‑minute intervals, unlimited scenarios
• Teams: $29.99/month – 50,000 operations, 30‑second intervals, shared history
• Enterprise: Custom – unlimited operations, dedicated support

Important: Make’s “operations” and Zapier’s “tasks” are roughly equivalent—but not exactly. A single Zap can consume multiple tasks if it has multiple steps. Make counts each module execution as one operation, which often makes it cheaper for multi‑step workflows.

Verdict on price: Make is significantly cheaper for mid‑to‑high volume users. A Pro plan on Make ($16.99 for 20,000 ops) compares to Zapier’s Professional ($73.99 for 2,000 tasks). Even if you account for step differences, Make’s cost per operation is much lower.

3. Integrations

Feature	Zapier	Make
Total app count	7,000+	2,000+
Popular apps (Salesforce, Hubspot, Shopify)	Yes	Yes
Custom apps (API)	Webhooks + Zapier API	Webhooks + extensive HTTP module
Native rate limiting	Handled internally	Requires manual scheduling

Zapier wins on raw integration count. If you use niche apps like a specific CRM for real estate agents or an obscure invoicing tool, Zapier probably has a native connector. Make covers the major players but has fewer long‑tail apps.

However, Make’s HTTP module lets you call any REST API with advanced options (e.g., OAuth, custom headers, pagination). Zapier’s webhooks are functional but less flexible when you need to parse JSON responses or iterate through arrays.

4. Advanced Features

Here’s where the gap widens.

Make’s standout capabilities:

• Data aggregation: Sum, count, or merge data from multiple sources before outputting to a single action.
• Loops & iterators: Process each item in an array (e.g., send a separate Slack message for each new row in a Google Sheet).
• Routers & filters: Complex branching logic with multiple conditions per path.
• Error handling: Retry mechanisms, break scenarios, or skip failed operations without killing the whole workflow.
• Transformation tools: Text manipulation (regex, replace, trim), date formatting, JSON/XML converters.

Zapier’s advanced features:

• Paths: Only available on Professional and above – up to 3 branches per Zap, then additional $20/month for more.
• Formatter: Text, numbers, and date utilities (basic, but improving).
• Webhooks: Trigger Zaps from any app, but limited in what you can do with the data.
• Custom logic with Code steps: Run JavaScript or Python (paid plans) – a workaround for missing features.

Make gives you more power out of the box without needing to write code. Zapier’s Code step works, but it’s a crutch for limitations they haven’t built natively.

5. Reliability & Support

• Uptime: Both have solid track records (99.9%+). Major outages are rare, though Zapier had a high‑profile downtime in 2024 that lasted several hours.
• Speed: Zapier’s average execution time is faster for simple Zaps (2‑5 seconds vs. Make’s 5‑10 seconds). Make is slower because it does more heavy lifting.
• Support: Zapier offers email and chat on paid plans; phone support on enterprise. Make’s free plan includes chat with limited availability; Pro+ users get faster responses. Community forums are active for both.

---

Comparison Table

Feature	Zapier	Make
Starting price (free)	100 tasks/mo	1,000 ops/mo
Paid plan entry	$29.99/mo (750 tasks)	$9.99/mo (10,000 ops)
Max tasks/ops (mid plan)	2,000 tasks ($73.99/mo)	50,000 ops ($29.99/mo)
Update speed (cheapest paid)	15 minutes	5 minutes
Visual workflow editor	No (linear steps)	Yes (canvas)
Conditional logic	Paths (extra cost)	Routers (included)
Loops	Not natively (use Code step)	Built‑in iterator
Error handling	Basic retry	Advanced (break, retry, continue)
Integrations	7,000+	2,000+
Custom API calls	Webhooks (limited)	HTTP module (full)
Code steps	JavaScript/Python (paid)	JavaScript (Pro plans)
Suitable for	Simple workflows, beginners	Complex automations, power users

---

Pros and Cons

Zapier

Pros:

• Fast to set up and learn – great for non‑technical team members.
• Largest app directory; you’ll almost always find a native connector.
• Reliable performance for basic automations.
• Good documentation and active community.

Cons:

• Expensive as tasks scale – the Professional plan only gives 2,000 tasks for $73.99.
• Limited built‑in logic – no native loops or data aggregation.
• Paths (branching) are an extra cost, not included.
• Debugging complex Zaps can be frustrating because you can’t see the full flow.

Make

Pros:

• Much cheaper per operation – especially for multi‑step workflows.
• Visual editor makes complex logic easy to understand and maintain.
• Built‑in loops, routers, aggregators, and error handling.
• Excellent HTTP module for connecting to any API.

Cons:

• Steeper learning curve – expect to spend a few hours getting comfortable.
• Smaller app directory; some niche apps lack native connectors.
• Slower execution speed for simple tasks.
• Documentation can be dense and less beginner‑friendly.

---

When to Choose Zapier

Pick Zapier if:

• You’re a solo freelancer or small team that needs simple one‑click automations (e.g., “new form entry → send email”).
• You rely on a specific app that only Zapier integrates with.
• You want to hand off workflows to non‑technical staff without training.

When to Choose Make

Pick Make if:

• You’re building multi‑step automations with conditional logic, loops, or data transformation.
• You need to keep costs low while running thousands of operations per month.
• You have a technical background (or are willing to learn) and want full control over your workflows.
• You’re connecting to custom APIs or need to process bulk datasets.

---

Final Verdict

The winner depends on your use case, but for most power users, Make is the better value and more capable tool.

Let me be honest: Zapier’s ease of use is unmatched. If you’re automating one or two simple tasks and don’t want to think about infrastructure, Zapier’s monthly fee is fine—though you’ll quickly hit limits and pay more. For growing businesses that need serious automation without bleeding cash, Make offers 10x the functionality for a fraction of the price.

My pick: Start with Make. The learning curve is real, but the savings and flexibility are worth it. You can always use Zapier for a quick integration that Make doesn’t support—but you’ll probably find that Make’s HTTP module handles almost everything.

Check Make (formerly Integromat) ->

Check Zapier ->

---

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I migrate my automations from Zapier to Make?

Partially. Make has a built-in Zapier importer that converts Zaps into scenarios, but complex logic (like Code steps or Paths) may need manual adjustment. Simple two‑step Zaps usually transfer cleanly.

2. Which tool handles large data volumes better?

Make is generally better for bulk processing (e.g., iterating through thousands of rows in a spreadsheet). Zapier’s free and lower‑paid plans have stricter rate limits, and tasks scale up in cost quickly.

3. Does Make still have the Integromat name?

The platform is now fully called Make. The old Integromat branding disappeared in 2022, but some legacy users still call it that. The product has only improved since the rebrand.

4. Are there any hidden costs I should know about?

Zapier charges for “premium apps” on lower plans – you have to upgrade to Professional to use advanced integrations like Salesforce. Make includes all apps in every plan. Also, Zapier’s “tasks” count each step, so a three‑step Zap uses three tasks per run. Make counts one operation per module execution.

5. Which tool is better for collaboration?

Zapier’s Team plan ($99/user/month) offers shared workspaces and folder organization. Make’s Teams plan ($29.99/month) is more affordable but has fewer collaboration features (no shared history on lower tiers). For larger teams, Zapier’s admin controls are stronger.

---

This comparison is based on real usage and thorough testing. Prices and features may change – always check the official websites for the latest details.